Difference between revisions of "XRGB-mini FRAMEMEISTER"

From Classic Console Upscaler wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '== Official Site == http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Fudoh Preview ==
 +
 +
- no D-Terminal breakout adapter included. Make sure to have one ready at home!
 +
- menu's completely in english. remote's completely in japanese.
 +
- no scanline density setting available. Scanlines are bit stronger than I like them (I prefer 160-175 on the XRGB-3)
 +
- no continuously adjustable zoom or overscan, just rough presets
 +
- "classic" scanlines work for 240p, 480i and 480p input
 +
- scaling engine looks ok, but not great
 +
- 240p processing looks very nice
 +
- 480i deinterlacing looks solid for real 480i titles, but weird for "240p on 480i" modes
 +
- 480p processing looked good on a "240p on 480p title" but kinda soft on a real 480p title
 +
- 480p output looks very much like a Faroudja processor (= less sharp than the XRGB-3)
 +
- 720p is great, 1080p is good.
 +
- 480p output with scanlines looks like a Videon + SLG3000
 +
- 720p output with scanlines looks like the XRGB-3 in B1
 +
- 1080p + scanlines = fail (because only 1 instead of 2 in every 4 lines are darkened, which doesn't look good)
 +
 
== Official Site ==
 
== Official Site ==
  
 
http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm
 
http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm

Revision as of 18:30, 15 December 2011

Fudoh Preview

- no D-Terminal breakout adapter included. Make sure to have one ready at home! - menu's completely in english. remote's completely in japanese. - no scanline density setting available. Scanlines are bit stronger than I like them (I prefer 160-175 on the XRGB-3) - no continuously adjustable zoom or overscan, just rough presets - "classic" scanlines work for 240p, 480i and 480p input - scaling engine looks ok, but not great - 240p processing looks very nice - 480i deinterlacing looks solid for real 480i titles, but weird for "240p on 480i" modes - 480p processing looked good on a "240p on 480p title" but kinda soft on a real 480p title - 480p output looks very much like a Faroudja processor (= less sharp than the XRGB-3) - 720p is great, 1080p is good. - 480p output with scanlines looks like a Videon + SLG3000 - 720p output with scanlines looks like the XRGB-3 in B1 - 1080p + scanlines = fail (because only 1 instead of 2 in every 4 lines are darkened, which doesn't look good)

Official Site

http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm