Difference between revisions of "XRGB-mini FRAMEMEISTER"
(Created page with '== Official Site == http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Fudoh Preview == | ||
| + | |||
| + | - no D-Terminal breakout adapter included. Make sure to have one ready at home! | ||
| + | - menu's completely in english. remote's completely in japanese. | ||
| + | - no scanline density setting available. Scanlines are bit stronger than I like them (I prefer 160-175 on the XRGB-3) | ||
| + | - no continuously adjustable zoom or overscan, just rough presets | ||
| + | - "classic" scanlines work for 240p, 480i and 480p input | ||
| + | - scaling engine looks ok, but not great | ||
| + | - 240p processing looks very nice | ||
| + | - 480i deinterlacing looks solid for real 480i titles, but weird for "240p on 480i" modes | ||
| + | - 480p processing looked good on a "240p on 480p title" but kinda soft on a real 480p title | ||
| + | - 480p output looks very much like a Faroudja processor (= less sharp than the XRGB-3) | ||
| + | - 720p is great, 1080p is good. | ||
| + | - 480p output with scanlines looks like a Videon + SLG3000 | ||
| + | - 720p output with scanlines looks like the XRGB-3 in B1 | ||
| + | - 1080p + scanlines = fail (because only 1 instead of 2 in every 4 lines are darkened, which doesn't look good) | ||
| + | |||
== Official Site == | == Official Site == | ||
http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm | http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 15 December 2011
Fudoh Preview
- no D-Terminal breakout adapter included. Make sure to have one ready at home! - menu's completely in english. remote's completely in japanese. - no scanline density setting available. Scanlines are bit stronger than I like them (I prefer 160-175 on the XRGB-3) - no continuously adjustable zoom or overscan, just rough presets - "classic" scanlines work for 240p, 480i and 480p input - scaling engine looks ok, but not great - 240p processing looks very nice - 480i deinterlacing looks solid for real 480i titles, but weird for "240p on 480i" modes - 480p processing looked good on a "240p on 480p title" but kinda soft on a real 480p title - 480p output looks very much like a Faroudja processor (= less sharp than the XRGB-3) - 720p is great, 1080p is good. - 480p output with scanlines looks like a Videon + SLG3000 - 720p output with scanlines looks like the XRGB-3 in B1 - 1080p + scanlines = fail (because only 1 instead of 2 in every 4 lines are darkened, which doesn't look good)
