Difference between revisions of "XRGB-mini FRAMEMEISTER"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Fudoh Preview == | == Fudoh Preview == | ||
| − | + | * no D-Terminal breakout adapter included. Make sure to have one ready at home! | |
| − | + | * menu's completely in english. remote's completely in japanese. | |
| − | + | * no scanline density setting available. Scanlines are bit stronger than I like them (I prefer 160-175 on the XRGB-3) | |
| − | + | * no continuously adjustable zoom or overscan, just rough presets | |
| − | + | * "classic" scanlines work for 240p, 480i and 480p input | |
| − | + | * scaling engine looks ok, but not great | |
| − | + | * 240p processing looks very nice | |
| − | + | * 480i deinterlacing looks solid for real 480i titles, but weird for "240p on 480i" modes | |
| − | + | * 480p processing looked good on a "240p on 480p title" but kinda soft on a real 480p title | |
| − | + | * 480p output looks very much like a Faroudja processor (= less sharp than the XRGB-3) | |
| − | + | * 720p is great, 1080p is good. | |
| − | + | * 480p output with scanlines looks like a Videon + SLG3000 | |
| − | + | * 720p output with scanlines looks like the XRGB-3 in B1 | |
| − | + | * 1080p + scanlines = fail (because only 1 instead of 2 in every 4 lines are darkened, which doesn't look good) | |
== Official Site == | == Official Site == | ||
http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm | http://www.micomsoft.co.jp/xrgb-mini.htm | ||
Revision as of 18:31, 15 December 2011
Fudoh Preview
- no D-Terminal breakout adapter included. Make sure to have one ready at home!
- menu's completely in english. remote's completely in japanese.
- no scanline density setting available. Scanlines are bit stronger than I like them (I prefer 160-175 on the XRGB-3)
- no continuously adjustable zoom or overscan, just rough presets
- "classic" scanlines work for 240p, 480i and 480p input
- scaling engine looks ok, but not great
- 240p processing looks very nice
- 480i deinterlacing looks solid for real 480i titles, but weird for "240p on 480i" modes
- 480p processing looked good on a "240p on 480p title" but kinda soft on a real 480p title
- 480p output looks very much like a Faroudja processor (= less sharp than the XRGB-3)
- 720p is great, 1080p is good.
- 480p output with scanlines looks like a Videon + SLG3000
- 720p output with scanlines looks like the XRGB-3 in B1
- 1080p + scanlines = fail (because only 1 instead of 2 in every 4 lines are darkened, which doesn't look good)
